‧Fortinet FortiClient Host Security 3.0: 94.33%
‧GRISOFT AVG Internet Security 7.5: 92.75%
‧Dr.Web Antivirus 4.33: 87.44%
‧AVIRA AntiVir ProfessionalEdition 7.0: 87.01%
‧Kaspersky Internet Security 6.0: 83.45%
‧Rising Antivirus 2006: 82.40%
‧ALWIL avast Professional 4.7: 79.16%
‧MicroWorld eScan Internet Security 8.0: 76.31%
‧McAfee Internet Security 2007: 71.55%
‧Symantec Internet Security 2007: 69.96%
‧F-Secure Internet Security 2007: 57.89%
‧CA Internet Security 2007: 55.74%
‧AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2007: 53.78%
‧Trend Micro Internet Security 2007: 53.71%
‧ESET NOD32 2.5: 49.51%
‧Kingsoft Internet Security 2007: 47.21%
詳細請參考:http://www.malware-test.com/tw/antivirus.html
對於這個機構測試的結果我感到訝異
瑞星殺毒境然在McAfee,Symantec,F-Secure,Trend Micro,NOD32前面,而僅次於Kaspersky
而誤報王Fortinet FortiClient Host Security竟然第一
啟發式誤報王Dr.Web在第三,領先Kaspersky
AVG也不可能這麼前面阿 還領先Kaspersky
NOD32竟然會輸Trend Micro
怪異的測試,甚至比AV-TEST更怪
-以下資訊轉至第五頁 #41 ----------------------------------
我剛剛看了malware-test 測試的PDF檔測試報告,我看了下一跳
是他圖檔放錯,還是根本亂測
NOD32 竟然病毒庫適用2006/11/10號的
AntiVir和一些防軟病毒庫適用2006/12/8
McAfee病毒庫是用2006/12/10
FAV是用2006/12/5的病毒庫
瑞星和一些防軟病毒庫是用2006/12/6
趨勢科技用的是3.971.50但2006/11/17病毒碼就到3.919.50了
卡巴斯基是用2006/12/3號的病毒庫
大家可以詳細看看PDF檔裡貼的防軟更新時間圖片,我看了嚇一跳
PDF測試報告載點:
http://malware-test.com/smf/index.ph...c=3124.0;id=46
下載頁:
http://malware-test.com/smf/index.ph...f&topic=3124.0
 |
回覆時引用此文章
作者：harry_chang2003
書籤