| 苦力一枚 ![]() | 圖像大小:1,032,192 bytes 閣下的下載時間:16.65 秒. 60.52 KBytes/sec SEEDnet 512/64 台中縣 怪事了 難道我的線路品質很好嗎?? 時間:我這一篇文章發表前一分鐘 tracert www.netfront.net Tracing route to hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms *.*.*.* 〈保密〉 2 60 ms 60 ms 60 ms swXXX-XXX-XXX.adsl.seed.net.tw [*.*.*.*]〈保密〉 3 61 ms 60 ms 60 ms 139.175.151.94 4 60 ms 60 ms 60 ms R58-41.seed.net.tw [139.175.58.41] 5 60 ms 70 ms 60 ms sj92-66.seed.net.tw [192.72.92.66] 6 220 ms 290 ms 321 ms h30-192-72-123.seed.net.tw [192.72.123.30] 7 80 ms 80 ms 80 ms 202.83.192.93 8 80 ms 90 ms 70 ms 202.83.192.1 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 91 ms 80 ms 70 ms hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] Trace complete. 我的ping資料 ping www.netfront.net Pinging hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=246 Ping statistics for 202.81.252.35: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 90ms, Average = 82ms |
| 回覆 |
| ~我比較喜歡打槍 | Ping 3次這次最好 Pinging hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=250 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=250 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=250 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=250 Ping statistics for 202.81.252.35: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 320ms, Average = 153ms Tracing route to hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 130 ms 60 ms 61 ms 2 50 ms 60 ms 100 ms c231.h202052070.is.net.tw [202.52.70.231] 3 60 ms 50 ms 180 ms c230.h202052070.is.net.tw [202.52.70.230] 4 121 ms 80 ms 80 ms c129.h210062131.is.net.tw [210.62.131.129] 5 120 ms 80 ms 70 ms c89.h061013006.is.net.tw [61.13.6.89] 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 80 ms 91 ms 270 ms hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] Trace complete. ISnet不是主要200M連香港?天啊!還是我的線路真的那麼爛 (先前用Seednet連在台灣也幾乎沒上過60KB/s,更別說去香港。一般上40KB/s,上50KB/s就很爽了 現在換ISnet也是,我的線路真那麼爛嗎......) |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 ![]() | hinet 512/64計時制~~08:00~~ Tracing route to hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 66 ms 66 ms 68 ms 61-217-161-254.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.217.161.25 4] 2 66 ms 67 ms 70 ms h42.s32.ts.hinet.net [168.95.32.42] 3 71 ms 62 ms 67 ms kh-b-c12r2.router.hinet.net [211.22.225.18] 4 73 ms 69 ms 71 ms 210.65.200.10 5 71 ms 70 ms 75 ms 211.22.35.225 6 70 ms 71 ms 71 ms 211.22.41.141 7 71 ms 76 ms 71 ms 211.78.148.242 8 212 ms 211 ms 208 ms 211.78.150.67 9 89 ms 91 ms 91 ms 202.83.192.93 10 90 ms 95 ms 89 ms 202.83.192.1 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 91 ms 95 ms 91 ms hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] Trace complete. ping www.netfront.net Pinging hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=246 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=246 Ping statistics for 202.81.252.35: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 96ms, Average = 94ms |
| 回覆 |
| 高級會員 | C:\WINDOWS>ping www.netfront.net Pinging hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=242 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=242 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=242 Reply from 202.81.252.35: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 202.81.252.35: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 41ms C:\WINDOWS>tracert www.netfront.net Tracing route to hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 13 ms 28 ms 14 ms 2 <10 ms 28 ms 27 ms 203.133.48.125 3 13 ms 28 ms 27 ms KHNOC-GSR-G5-1-CHINGLIAN.IX.giga.net.tw [203.187 .3.241] 4 27 ms 14 ms 27 ms TPNOC3-GSR-P7-1-OC3-KHNOC.IX.giga.net.tw [203.13 3.92.41] 5 13 ms 28 ms 27 ms TPNOC1-GSR-G5-2-TPNOC3.IX.giga.net.tw [203.133.9 2.9] 6 27 ms 14 ms 27 ms TPNOC1-G65-Peering.IX.giga.net.tw [203.133.2.252 ] 7 14 ms 27 ms 27 ms TPNOC1-G29-G50-G65.IX.giga.net.tw [203.204.205.6 2] 8 14 ms 27 ms 14 ms 210.62.255.24 9 27 ms 28 ms 27 ms ISNET-TWIX-PC-T3.rt.is.net.tw [210.62.131.242] 10 41 ms 42 ms 41 ms c129.h210062131.is.net.tw [210.62.131.129] 11 41 ms 41 ms 41 ms c89.h061013006.is.net.tw [61.13.6.89] 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 55 ms 41 ms 41 ms hope.netfront.net [202.81.252.35] Trace complete. |
| 回覆 |
| ~我比較喜歡打槍 | 引用:
![]() 圖像大小:1,032,192 bytes 閣下的下載時間:23.42 秒. 43.03 KBytes/sec 剛剛的測試 | |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 ![]() | 引用:
| |
| 回覆 |
| ~我比較喜歡打槍 | 引用:
剛剛把642R的ADSL Open Mode改成G.dmt(上次不知怎麼的設成MultiMode,然後自動成為T1.413。後來朋友說設定成G.dmt看看),結果一測破50KB/s,最高到58KB/s左右^^ 稍後再多測幾次確認看看 ^^ | |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 ![]() | 引用:
| |
| 回覆 |
| XML | RSS 2.0 | RSS |
本論壇所有文章僅代表留言者個人意見,並不代表本站之立場,討論區以「即時留言」方式運作,故無法完全監察所有即時留言,若您發現文章可能有異議,請 email :[email protected] 處理。