WNR3500L WAN to LAN throughput using different firmwares: MyOpenRouter

引用:

作者: bosa (WAN to LAN results): Original Netgear firmware V1.0.2.50_31.1.25: 240Mbps. Tomato K26USB-1.27.9047MIPSR2-beta16: 225Mbps. DD-WRT v24-14826-NEWD-2_K2.6_big: 80Mbps. OpenWRT Release 21May10 Kamikaze 8.09.2: 40Mbps.

引用:

作者: Kong Fast-NAT is generally called by this name since it is much faster than the netfilter NAT code. It doesn't keep track of connections, and this is both its main pro and con. Connection tracking takes a lot of processor power, and hence it is slower, which is one of the main reasons that the Fast-NAT is faster than Netfilter-NAT. As we also said, the bad thing about Fast-NAT doesn't track connections, which means it will not be able to do SNAT very well for whole networks, neither will it be able to NAT complex protocols such as FTP, IRC and other protocols that Netfilter-NAT is able to handle very well. This means that a couple of features dd-wrt offers would be unavailable. The original netgear firmware does not have these features and therefore does not suffer from this. Tomato had to disable the fast-nat module again since they found out that it will break some Tomato features as well.

openrouter.info - Asus RT-N56U - Performance
數位天堂 / Router CPU and memory benchmark
數位天堂 / ASUS RT-N16 四大韌體效能PK

引用:

圖片引用自數位天堂