BCM53115 好像還是高出一些 而且我MBA是BCM chipset XD
感覺上Broadcom 硬體效能似乎略勝一籌, 然而由E4200 & E3000 的效能差距可知還是韌體最重要, 小弟覺得Buffalo 韌體好像有些問題, 即便DD-WRT 也無法完全改善, TP-LINK 各方面算是比較持平, 外接天線是最大優點, thx 兄若想玩Load Balance 的話, 可能還是能刷OpenWrt 者比較適合, QoS 則有Gargoyle 的加持, 由於Atheros 平台遠比Broadcom 開放, 所以即便Broadcom 效能較佳, 小弟還是寧可推薦Atheros 平台

能否麻煩Aven 兄在 "數位天堂 / Router CPU and memory benchmark (http://digiland.tw/viewtopic.php?id=409)" 加入TL-WR1043ND 的測試? 如此便可以用BCM4718@480MHz 來評估BCM4717@354MHz 的效能, 並和AR9132@400MHz 比較, 不過如果以 "OpenSSL Benchmarks - OpenWrt Wiki (http://wiki.openwrt.org/inbox/benchmark.openssl)" 推估的話, AR9132@400MHz 和AR7161@680MHz 兩者效能大約和頻率或BogoMIPS 成正比, 然而Broadcom CPU BogoMIPS 似乎有點偏低

Router Charts - 2.4 GHz Downlink Throughput - SmallNetBuilder (http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/bar/58-2_4-ghz-dn)
OpenWrt / Multi-WAN Load Balancing (https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=23904)

Rt3662 有啥便宜機種嗎?

目前已經出現而且比較可見應該是D社的DIR-815了，官方定價就不到三張小朋友
不過小的沒摸過....不敢下定論
小的用過E社的，只能說「X的！怎麼不快點上市啊:D」

幹嘛D社E社的，說清楚好嗎?
D-link跟EDiMAX嗎?
我只聽過顏....社......XD

一朝被蛇咬，十年怕草繩…
看到Linksys就有點怕怕的~

可否分享經驗 ?

幹嘛D社E社的，說清楚好嗎?
D-link跟EDiMAX嗎?
我只聽過顏....社......XD
這不是善人！！這不是善人！！:cry:

可否分享經驗 ?
可以從 Linksys SD2008 Gigabit switch (http://www.pczone.com.tw/vbb3/thread/16/138855/4/#post1035348) 開始看…

幹嘛D社E社的，說清楚好嗎?
D-link跟EDiMAX嗎?
我只聽過顏....社......XD
這不是善人！！這不是善人！！:cry:

這算露出本性了嗎？:fd:

lenbo那個其實linksys也是非戰之罪,它都已經用日本電容了.

數位天堂有網友提到ASUS RT-N16 只要NTD2800, 規格更好, 不過小弟發現BCM471X 會比較快可能是有原因的
WNR3500L WAN to LAN throughput using different firmwares: MyOpenRouter (http://www.myopenrouter.com/forum/thread/21393/WNR3500L-WAN-to-LAN-throughput-using-different-firmwares/?page=2#5889)
(WAN to LAN results):

Original Netgear firmware V1.0.2.50_31.1.25: 240Mbps.

Tomato K26USB-1.27.9047MIPSR2-beta16: 225Mbps.

DD-WRT v24-14826-NEWD-2_K2.6_big: 80Mbps.

OpenWRT Release 21May10 Kamikaze 8.09.2: 40Mbps.
Fast-NAT is generally called by this name since it is much faster than the netfilter NAT code. It doesn't keep track of connections, and this is both its main pro and con. Connection tracking takes a lot of processor power, and hence it is slower, which is one of the main reasons that the Fast-NAT is faster than Netfilter-NAT. As we also said, the bad thing about Fast-NAT doesn't track connections, which means it will not be able to do SNAT very well for whole networks, neither will it be able to NAT complex protocols such as FTP, IRC and other protocols that Netfilter-NAT is able to handle very well.

This means that a couple of features dd-wrt offers would be unavailable. The original netgear firmware does not have these features and therefore does not suffer from this. Tomato had to disable the fast-nat module again since they found out that it will break some Tomato features as well.
否則若是純粹比較CPU 的效能, 則BCM4718@480MHz 僅小幅領先AR9132@400Mhz, 而BCM4717@354MHz 則應該會落後於AR9132@400Mhz, 至於Ralink CPU 則似乎有點虛有其表, 不過從各方面數據來看Broadcom 的無線效能似乎是最差的, Broadcom 似乎是強在於有線的部份, 然而數據也顯示只要改刷DD-WRT 或OpenWrt, 網路傳輸效能就會大幅下降, 原因很可能是未啟用Fast-NAT
openrouter.info - Asus RT-N56U (http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://openrouter.info/index.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26view%3Darticle%26id%3D273:asus-rt-n56u%26catid%3D41:recenzje%26Itemid%3D55) - Performance
數位天堂 / Router CPU and memory benchmark (http://digiland.tw/viewtopic.php?id=409)
數位天堂 / ASUS RT-N16 四大韌體效能PK (http://digiland.tw/viewtopic.php?id=1200)
http://digiland.tw/uploads/2_rt-n16_iperf_pk.gif
圖片引用自數位天堂 (http://digiland.tw)
Download - TomatoUSB (http://tomatousb.org/download)

lenbo都是奇摩子式買法～:sleep:

lenbo那個其實linksys也是非戰之罪,它都已經用日本電容了.

借版面請問一下，預算NTD$10000，需求為：
1. 11n，可更換之外接天線。
2. 可架設VPN
3. 較高完整度的支援DDNS

有沒有推薦的機種？