【抱怨】千萬別用黑Net他簡直濫暴了！！！！！

可列印頁面

2004-06-07, 07:15 PM
lulu1305174

【抱怨】千萬別用黑Net他簡直濫暴了！！！！！

黑Net連外有掛TP，據說最近國內也掛TP了，而黑Net最連外近狂掉圖和掉網頁，而黑Net在還沒有擴增大陸頻寬前ping中國電信高達500、600ms甚至最高時達1100ms而且常常掉包，擴增頻寬600多Mbps後ping值降到170~190ms，現在又恢復到500、600ms最高時達700、800ms，並且在擴充頻寬前最慢下載速度不到10KB甚至最低時只有幾百個位元組而已，而擴充頻寬前ping中國網通ping值達到300ms，現在掉到170~190ms，不過前幾天一度又到300m。ping HKIX的ping值在80~100ms前幾天也升到170~190ms現在恢復了，而且黑Net連外都無法跑到極速，另外黑Net連國內其他ISP有做限速措施，也無法跑到極速，而且連自家人的TWIX都塞車，流量高達500Mbps，另外黑Net用戶是無法下載Giga網路硬碟的。
測試時間：6月7號PM7:15
測速結果：
HKIX:
Pinging spring.itsc.cuhk.edu.hk [137.189.8.146] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=240
Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=240
Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=240
Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 137.189.8.146:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 136ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 142ms

Pinging fjt.todayisp.com [61.145.112.44] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=761ms TTL=43
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=775ms TTL=43
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 761ms, Maximum = 775ms, Average = 768ms
Pinging cn.vip.cnb.yahoo.com [202.43.216.55] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=243
Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=243
Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=243
Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 202.43.216.55:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 147ms, Maximum = 177ms, Average = 159ms
Pinging libra.sina.com.cn [61.135.153.176] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 61.135.153.176:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 272ms, Maximum = 343ms, Average = 292ms
Pinging hk.yahoo.com [202.1.233.33] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=246
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=246
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=246
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 202.1.233.33:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 143ms, Maximum = 150ms, Average = 147ms
Pinging sina.com.hk [202.85.139.140] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=239
Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=239
Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=239
Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 202.85.139.140:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 144ms
Pinging kr.yahoo.com [211.32.119.135] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=337ms TTL=236
Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=339ms TTL=236
Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=236
Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=347ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 211.32.119.135:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 337ms, Maximum = 347ms, Average = 341ms
YAHOO:
Pinging [url]www.yahoo.akadns.net[/url] [66.94.230.37] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=55
Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 66.94.230.37:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 216ms, Maximum = 218ms, Average = 217ms

Pinging [url]www.google.akadns.net[/url] [66.102.7.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=244
Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=244
Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=244
Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 66.102.7.104:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 195ms, Maximum = 199ms, Average = 197ms

Pinging [url]www.giga.net.tw[/url] [203.133.0.185] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=119
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=119
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=119
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=119

Ping statistics for 203.133.0.185:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 69ms, Average = 65ms

[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/anet.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/hinet.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/giga.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/ntut.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/apol.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/hinetftp.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/seednet.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/apolftp.html[/iFrame] [iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/gigaftp.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/ttnftp.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/seederftp.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/ebtftp.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/burning.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/china.html[/iFrame]
測試時間：6月7日PM6:20
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/ntuftp.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/toget.html[/iFrame]
[iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/yahoo1.html[/iFrame] [iFrame]http://home.kimo.com.tw/lulu1305174/yahoo2.html[/iFrame]
2004-06-07, 08:33 PM
lokae

哇!!看圖說故事.......
2004-06-07, 09:34 PM
hy219

我是懶的去PING
最近自從全部升速後
每天去的國內外網站都感覺變慢
連大白天去KIMO都覺得變慢了
2004-06-07, 10:07 PM
mgoii

我剛才也發了一帖,,強烈質疑hinet目前的連線品質有問題
或許hinet會說,我降價了,也給你們用戶提高上傳了,當然要從其它地方把你們的錢"卡"過來
2004-06-10, 08:50 PM
jmi

呃...ADSL 1M/64K 能跑到 10x KB/s 的速度算正常吧~
你認為是 1024 / 8 = 128 KB/s 才叫做極速嘛??
2004-06-11, 12:52 PM
Fatland

以速博的 ping 值來說和您的數值來比也是互有勝負，還可以接受吧

#ping 61.145.112.44
PING 61.145.112.44 (61.145.112.44): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=292.7 ms
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=282.1 ms
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=266.7 ms
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=260.4 ms

#ping hk.yahoo.com
PING hk.yahoo.com (202.1.233.33): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=221.6 ms
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=229.5 ms
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=228.1 ms
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=209.9 ms

不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟，現在很多家都不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟，是誰的問題？
2004-06-11, 02:23 PM
timayang0602

[url=http://www.pczone.com.tw/showthread.php?t=112167&perpage=15&pagenumber=1]【求助】請問GIGA和中華對連是不是有問題？ [/url]
2004-06-12, 01:51 PM
cwl5858

[QUOTE][i]最初由 Fatland 發表[/i]
[B]以速博的 ping 值來說和您的數值來比也是互有勝負，還可以接受吧

#ping 61.145.112.44
PING 61.145.112.44 (61.145.112.44): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=292.7 ms
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=282.1 ms
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=266.7 ms
64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=260.4 ms

#ping hk.yahoo.com
PING hk.yahoo.com (202.1.233.33): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=221.6 ms
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=229.5 ms
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=228.1 ms
64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=209.9 ms

不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟，現在很多家都不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟，是誰的問題？ [/B][/QUOTE]

= =|||

我的小isp看起來都比你們用的那些大isp好耶:eye:

昨天晚上連去大陸打cs，朋友用黑net的ping都比我高＝＝..我還開emule勒..

--------------------------------------------------
Pinging 61.145.112.44 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 125ms, Average = 119ms
-------------------------------------------------------
Pinging hk.yahoo.com [202.1.233.33] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=246
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=246
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=246
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 202.1.233.33:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 82ms, Maximum = 86ms, Average = 84ms
------------------------------------------------------------
Pinging kr.yahoo.com [211.32.119.135] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=238
Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=238
Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=238
Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=238

Ping statistics for 211.32.119.135:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 111ms, Maximum = 131ms, Average = 117ms
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pinging fjt.todayisp.com [61.145.112.44] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 127ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 130ms
---------------------------------------------------------
2004-06-12, 02:00 PM
cwl5858

[QUOTE][i]最初由 jmi 發表[/i]
[B]呃...ADSL 1M/64K 能跑到 10x KB/s 的速度算正常吧~
你認為是 1024 / 8 = 128 KB/s 才叫做極速嘛?? [/B][/QUOTE]

他是說目前黑net連外實在太糟糕了，且瀏覽個網頁都一直掉圖，誰不會氣啊！

之前就是因為太鳥了才換掉的...

名符其實的又貴又爛...:corkysm:
2004-06-12, 02:38 PM
demon

可是不用他要用誰啊?
2004-06-12, 02:59 PM
LordVader

[QUOTE][i]最初由 demon 發表[/i]
[B]可是不用他要用誰啊? [/B][/QUOTE]
Seednet/sonet/TTN/Seeder/Sparq/Giga/TFN/APOL......
前提是有沒有做好功課看看論壇上歷來對於各家ISP業者的評價？
即便是8M/640K現在也不只有咳孽特獨有了。
2004-06-12, 10:13 PM
timayang0602

[QUOTE][i]最初由 cwl5858 發表[/i]
[B]他是說目前黑net連外實在太糟糕了，且瀏覽個網頁都一直掉圖，誰不會氣啊！

之前就是因為太鳥了才換掉的...

名符其實的又貴又爛...:corkysm: [/B][/QUOTE]
若您有固定ip 可使用看看小弟用後比較不會
2004-06-12, 10:17 PM
cwl5858

[QUOTE][i]最初由 timayang0602 發表[/i]
[B]若您有固定ip 可使用看看小弟用後比較不會 [/B][/QUOTE]

固定IP是最近才堆的,不然以前哪有選擇,可是才一個不經過TP,那麼其他台電腦呢?

直接換ISP比較快吧!
2004-06-14, 02:33 AM
leon6922

[QUOTE][i]最初由 demon 發表[/i]
[B]可是不用他要用誰啊? [/B][/QUOTE]
你真的此言差以阿~
放眼國內各isp~
你真的只認同華電嗎?:(
giga~so net~等.....都不錯阿~~:)
2004-06-14, 02:49 PM
timayang0602

[QUOTE][i]最初由 cwl5858 發表[/i]
[B]固定IP是最近才堆的,不然以前哪有選擇,可是才一個不經過TP,那麼其他台電腦呢?

直接換ISP比較快吧! [/B][/QUOTE]
是阿固定ip是最近的事情但是從8M/640K出現浮動IP就常常掉網頁,掉圖
可以使用分享器阿不過還是差不多
小弟寧願付違約費用也不想用黑NET 可惜.....申請人不是我...
2004-06-15, 06:06 PM
calvinks

快換了吧，我支持你