【抱怨】Hinet連外連內頻寬均已不足



贊助商連結


lulu1305174
2004-08-24, 12:07 PM
Hinet
Pinging www.hinet.net [61.219.38.89] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.219.38.89: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=250
Reply from 61.219.38.89: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=250
Reply from 61.219.38.89: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=250
Reply from 61.219.38.89: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=250

Ping statistics for 61.219.38.89:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 60ms, Average = 60ms
SeedNet晚上ping值會飆到一兩百ms
Pinging www.seed.net.tw [192.72.80.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 192.72.80.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 69ms, Average = 64ms
亞太線上
Pinging www.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.100] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=245
Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=245
Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=245
Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 203.79.224.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 100ms, Maximum = 107ms, Average = 104ms
So-Net
Pinging www.so-net.net.tw [61.64.127.7] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 61.64.127.7:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 65ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 65ms
Giga
Pinging www.giga.net.tw [203.133.0.185] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=225ms TTL=118
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=118
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=213ms TTL=118
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 203.133.0.185:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 213ms, Maximum = 353ms, Average = 253ms
TTN
Pinging web.vhost.ttn.net [202.145.139.3] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.145.139.3: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=248
Reply from 202.145.139.3: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=248
Reply from 202.145.139.3: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=248
Reply from 202.145.139.3: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=248

Ping statistics for 202.145.139.3:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 62ms
和宇
Pinging www.kgex.com.tw [211.78.1.5] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.78.1.5: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.1.5: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.1.5: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.1.5: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 211.78.1.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 72ms, Average = 66ms
和網
Pinging www.kbtelecom.net [61.63.0.124] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51
Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=51
Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51
Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 61.63.0.124:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 66ms
台固
Pinging whmw21.tfn.net.tw [211.78.215.231] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 211.78.215.231:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 74ms, Average = 68ms
速博
Pinging www.sparq.com.tw [211.78.130.140] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.78.130.140: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=244
Reply from 211.78.130.140: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=244
Reply from 211.78.130.140: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=244
Reply from 211.78.130.140: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 211.78.130.140:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 63ms
TANET
Pinging web.tp.edu.tw [163.21.249.253] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 163.21.249.253: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=55
Reply from 163.21.249.253: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=55
Reply from 163.21.249.253: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=55
Reply from 163.21.249.253: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 163.21.249.253:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 63ms
TPIX
Pinging www.tpix.net.tw [203.163.192.251] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 203.163.192.251:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 63ms
網達(TWNAP)
Pinging www.savecom.net.tw [210.209.13.12] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=53
Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=53
Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=53
Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 210.209.13.12:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 63ms
悉達
Pinging www.seeder.net [202.43.64.5] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=119
Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=119
Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=119
Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=119

Ping statistics for 202.43.64.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 64ms
台中線上
Pinging www.tcol.com.tw [203.217.96.4] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=116
Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=116
Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=116
Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 203.217.96.4:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 69ms, Average = 67ms
光速通訊
Pinging www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=117
Request timed out.
Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=117
Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 61.58.64.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 235ms, Maximum = 250ms, Average = 241ms
曜正科技
Pinging www.easy-up.net [211.76.239.3] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.76.239.3: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=119
Reply from 211.76.239.3: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=119
Reply from 211.76.239.3: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=119
Reply from 211.76.239.3: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=119

Ping statistics for 211.76.239.3:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 65ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 66ms
HKIX平常時80~100ms,尖峰時段150~300ms
Pinging spring.itsc.cuhk.edu.hk [137.189.8.146] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=240
Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=240
Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=240
Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 137.189.8.146:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 147ms, Maximum = 155ms, Average = 150ms
YAHOOHK
Pinging hk.yahoo.com [202.1.233.33] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=244
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=244
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=244
Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 202.1.233.33:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 147ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 153ms
SINAHK
Pinging sina.com.hk [202.85.139.140] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=239
Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=239
Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=239
Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 202.85.139.140:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 118ms, Maximum = 119ms, Average = 118ms
YAHOOCN
Pinging cn.vip.cnb.yahoo.com [202.43.216.55] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=324ms TTL=244
Request timed out.
Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=297ms TTL=244
Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 202.43.216.55:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 282ms, Maximum = 324ms, Average = 301ms
SINACN
Pinging libra.sina.com.cn [61.135.152.72] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.135.152.72: bytes=32 time=259ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.135.152.72: bytes=32 time=275ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.135.152.72: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=53
Reply from 61.135.152.72: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 61.135.152.72:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 259ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 268ms
爆米花網絡之前ping值200多ms現在ping值400~900ms
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=746ms TTL=51
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=718ms TTL=51
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=733ms TTL=51
Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=743ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 718ms, Maximum = 746ms, Average = 735ms
Google平常時195~210ms
Pinging www.google.akadns.net [64.233.167.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=239
Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=265ms TTL=241
Reply from 64.233.167.104: bytes=32 time=266ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 64.233.167.104:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 265ms, Maximum = 271ms, Average = 267ms
YAHOO
Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [66.94.230.45] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.94.230.45: bytes=32 time=192ms TTL=53
Reply from 66.94.230.45: bytes=32 time=192ms TTL=54
Reply from 66.94.230.45: bytes=32 time=193ms TTL=54
Reply from 66.94.230.45: bytes=32 time=194ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 66.94.230.45:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 192ms, Maximum = 194ms, Average = 192ms
YAHOOKR

Pinging home.vip.krn.yahoo.com [202.43.214.190] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.43.214.190: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=243
Reply from 202.43.214.190: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=243
Reply from 202.43.214.190: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=243
Reply from 202.43.214.190: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 202.43.214.190:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 123ms, Maximum = 130ms, Average = 125ms
YAHOOSG
Pinging sg.news.search.yahoo.com [202.3.13.46] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.3.13.46: bytes=32 time=123ms TTL=51
Reply from 202.3.13.46: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=51
Reply from 202.3.13.46: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=51
Reply from 202.3.13.46: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 202.3.13.46:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 122ms, Maximum = 123ms, Average = 122ms
西NTT
Pinging www.ntt-west.co.jp [210.172.39.71] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 210.172.39.71: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=242
Reply from 210.172.39.71: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=242
Reply from 210.172.39.71: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=242
Reply from 210.172.39.71: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 210.172.39.71:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 119ms, Average = 112ms

贊助商連結


swing
2004-08-24, 01:51 PM
這個早就知道了,HINET 的國內頻寬早已遠遠落後其他 ISP 了,
就連每個人享有的國外頻寬也已經不夠了,不然何必使用 TP 呢

supermaxfight
2004-08-24, 06:39 PM
這不是新聞了吧...

timayang0602
2004-08-24, 09:37 PM
這已經很久了不是嗎?
3XX萬用戶這樣還比不過1X萬用戶的頻寬

darksnow
2004-08-25, 12:12 AM
國內還好吧?
剛剛11時前後測的
除了seednet和apol回應時間有點長,
還有時好時壞的怪怪lsc,其他大致上還可以啊!
不過連大陸有些地區晚上蠻差的...:corkysm:



Pinging www.hinet.net [203.66.88.89] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.66.88.89: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=250
Reply from 203.66.88.89: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=250
Reply from 203.66.88.89: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=250
Reply from 203.66.88.89: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=250

Ping statistics for 203.66.88.89:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 36ms

Pinging www.seed.net.tw [192.72.80.36] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=247
Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=247
Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=247
Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 192.72.80.36:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 83ms, Maximum = 97ms, Average = 89ms

Tracing route to www.seed.net.tw [192.72.80.36]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

4 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms tp-s2-c12r1.router.hinet.net [210.65.2.10]
5 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms tp-twix-r6.router.hinet.net [211.22.32.69]
6 102 ms 103 ms 102 ms 211.22.41.241
7 96 ms 97 ms 97 ms snback3.seed.net.tw [139.175.56.205]
8 85 ms 84 ms 86 ms R56-212.seed.net.tw [139.175.56.212]
9 91 ms 92 ms 90 ms www.seed.net.tw [192.72.80.36]

Trace complete.


Pinging www.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.100] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=246
Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=246
Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=246
Reply from 203.79.224.100: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 203.79.224.100:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 87ms, Maximum = 96ms, Average = 90ms



Tracing route to www.apol.com.tw [203.79.224.100]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
4 40 ms 39 ms 39 ms tp-s2-c12r2.router.hinet.net [210.65.200.10]
5 37 ms 37 ms 37 ms tp-twix-r6.router.hinet.net [211.22.32.193]
6 41 ms 40 ms 39 ms 211.22.41.233
7 67 ms 67 ms 70 ms 211-76-98-9.ebix.net.tw [211.76.98.9]
8 74 ms 73 ms 73 ms 211-76-97-98.ebix.net.tw [211.76.97.98]
9 * * * Request timed out.
10 81 ms 82 ms 82 ms www.ht.net.tw [203.79.224.100]


Pinging www.so-net.net.tw [61.64.127.7] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=245
Reply from 61.64.127.7: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=245

Ping statistics for 61.64.127.7:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 42ms


Pinging www.giga.net.tw [203.133.0.185] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=118
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=118
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=118
Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=118

Ping statistics for 203.133.0.185:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 41ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 43ms



Pinging www.ttn.net [202.145.138.199] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=57
Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=57
Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=57
Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 202.145.138.199:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 42ms



Pinging www.ttn.net [202.145.138.199] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=57
Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=57
Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=57
Reply from 202.145.138.199: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 202.145.138.199:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 42ms


Pinging www.kbtelecom.net [61.63.0.124] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=52
Reply from 61.63.0.124: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 61.63.0.124:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 42ms



Pinging whmw21.tfn.net.tw [211.78.215.231] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 211.78.215.231:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms


Pinging whmw21.tfn.net.tw [211.78.215.231] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=116
Reply from 211.78.215.231: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 211.78.215.231:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms



Pinging www.tp.edu.tw [163.21.249.220] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 163.21.249.220: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=246
Reply from 163.21.249.220: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=246
Reply from 163.21.249.220: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=246
Reply from 163.21.249.220: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 163.21.249.220:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 48ms


Pinging www.tpix.net.tw [203.163.192.251] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=247
Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=247
Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=247
Reply from 203.163.192.251: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 203.163.192.251:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 38ms


Pinging www.savecom.net.tw [210.209.13.12] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53
Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=53
Reply from 210.209.13.12: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 210.209.13.12:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms


Pinging www.seeder.net [202.43.64.5] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=120
Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=120
Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=120
Reply from 202.43.64.5: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=120

Ping statistics for 202.43.64.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 38ms



Pinging www.tcol.com.tw [203.217.96.4] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=116
Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=116
Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=116
Reply from 203.217.96.4: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=116

Ping statistics for 203.217.96.4:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 42ms


Pinging www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=488ms TTL=117
Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=464ms TTL=117
Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=479ms TTL=117
Reply from 61.58.64.9: bytes=32 time=482ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 61.58.64.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 464ms, Maximum = 488ms, Average = 478ms

Tracing route to www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

4 37 ms 37 ms 38 ms tp-s2-c12r1.router.hinet.net [210.65.2.10]
5 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms tp-twix-r1.router.hinet.net [211.22.35.97]
6 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms tp-twix-r5.router.hinet.net [210.65.161.125]
7 39 ms 39 ms 39 ms 210.62.255.46
8 39 ms 38 ms 39 ms 211-76-98-106.ebix.net.tw [211.76.98.106]
9 441 ms 437 ms 430 ms 211-76-98-61.ebix.net.tw [211.76.98.61]
10 436 ms 428 ms 433 ms 211-76-97-98.ebix.net.tw [211.76.97.98]
11 431 ms 430 ms 440 ms NK210-201-31-194.static.apol.com.tw [210.201.31.
194]
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 479 ms 465 ms 458 ms www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9]

Trace complete.

Tracing route to www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

4 37 ms 37 ms 38 ms tp-s2-c12r1.router.hinet.net [210.65.2.10]
5 37 ms 39 ms 37 ms tp-twix-r1.router.hinet.net [211.22.35.97]
6 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms tp-twix-r5.router.hinet.net [210.65.161.125]
7 39 ms 39 ms 38 ms 210.62.255.46
8 * * 38 ms 211-76-98-106.ebix.net.tw [211.76.98.106]
9 37 ms 38 ms 39 ms 211-76-98-61.ebix.net.tw [211.76.98.61]
10 38 ms 39 ms 39 ms 211-76-97-98.ebix.net.tw [211.76.97.98]
11 * 44 ms 46 ms NK210-201-31-194.static.apol.com.tw [210.201.31.
194]
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 * 48 ms * www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9]
14 227 ms 239 ms 244 ms www.lsc.net.tw [61.58.64.9]

Trace complete.

elvada
2004-08-28, 07:59 PM
沒辦法
跟大家共享頻寬
集縮比只要不是1:1
都很難不LAG
而且你又是在晚上大家在家時上網

石之軒
2004-08-31, 08:36 PM
還好吧,大部分的用戶都在網內,只要骨幹夠大應付的來即可.
網外頻寬適中就好,那像某幾間ISP大量灌水,
這樣擠在前幾名還有何意思:confused:

島外就OOXX..

darksnow
2004-09-22, 03:09 AM
對大陸的話,大部分好像都還好,就是連cnc-group(中國網通)的下的會很慘,
前陣子反應過,他打來是說是有這現象,但增加頻寬中國網通好像不容易談,
可能要等一陣子才會擴充. 香港的話說是最近應該會增加頻寬.
這是一兩個星期前email反應後,台北hinet的人打來說的......

robocat
2004-09-22, 04:11 PM
最初由 darksnow 發表
對大陸的話,大部分好像都還好,就是連cnc-group(中國網通)的下的會很慘,
前陣子反應過,他打來是說是有這現象,但增加頻寬中國網通好像不容易談,
可能要等一陣子才會擴充. 香港的話說是最近應該會增加頻寬.
這是一兩個星期前email反應後,台北hinet的人打來說的......

對CNC頻寬不夠,中華電信是真的沒輒
而且也算老問題了
這是因為CNC他們自己沒足夠的海纜頻寬
這部分只能等對方解決自身的問題才有辦法解決目前的頻寬不足問題

但如果是對chinanet頻寬不足,中華電信就比較使得上力了