| 會員  | FreeBSD 之所以不若 Linux 一般的普遍 還是得說到當初的法律訴訟問題 導致所有BSD禁止散佈 而這個訴訟一拖就是數年 此時 Linux 崛起 而 BSD 在經過之前沿用原始碼的修改之後 加上這場訴訟 Novell 無意繼續下去而劃上休止符 現在的 FreeBSD, 已經是僅存真正的純淨 Unix 其他的商業 system V 都已經是經過許多的修改 雖然市場起步慢 但是 FreeBSD 的穩定與安全性 + 效能 仍然站穩毅力不搖的地位 |
| 回覆 |
| 大一新鮮人XD  | 引用:
只是....沒有Linux比較具有親合力......如果台灣有人出ㄉ話... 玩Linuxㄉ會換成BSDㄇ?? | |
| 回覆 |
| 隱士  | 我也是先從linux 再轉為BSD… 目前曾用過open linux , rh linux 6.1~7.3, freeBSD 4.3~4.4… 其中在玩linux的過程不難發現，rh 似乎有走向windows的趨勢，介面愈來愈像，連安裝的時候也差不多~ 或許這是大眾普遍適用m$ windows的習慣吧~ 但我覺得…如果要學…倒不如學的徹底一點~ 應該會很好玩~~^^ BSD 真的是不錯用，記得第一次碰電腦，是用dos5.0的作業系統，覺得熟背指令…手指在鍵盤間迅速的彈跳，有一種莫名的快感~~ 後來使用windows…都只要用滑鼠就ok…感覺起來並不是很好… 雖然真的是很方便… 後來玩linux …受了windows的影響… 一開linux就進 x window… 真的是很糟糕… 現在已經好一點了~~^^|| 現在開始接觸freeBSD… 熟記指令、快速且無誤的鍵入指令 似乎又找回來以前的感覺… 而且linux也有文字模式… 也是很不錯… ^^ |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 | 我個人覺得，在OSS世界裡，並沒有什麼好壞之分 喜歡用RedHat, mandrake,debain,slackware...等Linux就去用 喜歡用OpenBSD,Beos,Freebsd的人，就去用 因為，這是OSS 每個人有充份選擇的權利 就看你習慣使用哪一種OS或是軟體 不過，別忘了把自己的心得也貢獻出來給其它人哦 |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 | 這篇有沒有原文阿 翻譯ㄉ怪怪ㄉ有點搞校.... |
| 回覆 |
| 進階會員 | Linux is great, but don't forget about BSD FROM : www.techrepublic.com Dec 3, 2001 | John McCormick I hear a lot of discussion about how superior Linux is to Microsoft’s operating systems. Certainly, there are many more attacks targeting Windows and IIS platforms. A good case can also be made that Linux is inherently more stable and secure than Microsoft products, either because it’s based on a better core of code or because it’s open source, and many individuals have a stake in monitoring and making repairs. However, with all this discussion, there rarely seems to be any mention of an even more secure and completely free version of UNIX: BSD. While Linux is the darling of the hacker set, it is far from the least expensive or even the most secure open source operating system available. Linux isn’t even running on the widest range of systems. All three of those distinctions belong to an academically developed version of UNIX that originated at the University of California, Berkeley and whose various versions are often referred to collectively as BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution). Linux vs. BSD Linus Torvalds’ Linux is quite a youngster compared to BSD. At two decades of age, BSD is as old as the PC and was running in universities back when Bill Gates was famous for MS-DOS. So you may well ask, “If BSD’s so great, why aren’t more people using it?” There are a variety of reasons, although none of them is related to the quality of the operating system itself. One reason users tend to favor Linux over BSD is cultural. Linux is a hacker’s delight. The hacker community latched onto it in part because it was good and also because of the mythos surrounding its development: Shut a lone Finnish hacker in a room with a computer for a few months and out pops a major operating system! That’s as much urban myth as truth, but Torvalds is directly responsible for creating and making Linux available and should get a great deal of credit for his hard work. But while the origin of Linux has a bit of hacker romance, BSD comes directly from the academic community and its development is tied more closely to computer science departments than the freewheeling exchange of hackers. When companies started hiring hackers to install and manage the Internet, they naturally turned to their old friend Linux rather than the hidebound (in their view) BSD. Another reason Linux has become so popular is that a number of enterprising individuals and companies have found that there’s money to be made selling Linux distributions and support services. Without Red Hat and other Linux distributors, who have made it easier to install and have added some shrink-wrapped packaging acceptable to corporate management, Linux would probably have been a mere blip on the corporate landscape. Linux also owes a major debt to BSD, which took on AT&T (Bell Labs invented UNIX) in a major battle over licensing the operating system. The battle between AT&T and BSD supporters hurt both UNIX and BSD, leaving the field wide open for Linux development and marketing. However, even though Linux has received a lot more attention than BSD, that doesn’t mean that BSD has been ignored. A number of large organizations have quietly built their empires on the BSD core, including Yahoo. Some major IBM systems even rely on BSD. BSD distributions We’re going to take a quick look at three major BSD-licensed UNIX versions: OpenBSD, NetBSD, and FreeBSD. All three can be downloaded from the Internet for free and have no restrictions on their use. In fact, the BSD open source license is even more “open” than the GPL that governs Linux. Of course, most people will pay something for even these operating systems if they want to avoid long downloads. After all, a two-CD set containing OpenBSD costs just $30, and you can make all the copies you want and install it on as many systems as you choose. If you’re looking for a highly secure OS, then you need look no further than OpenBSD, which is probably the most secure operating system ever developed. If that seems a far-fetched claim, just remember that it’s been four years since a major (or even minor) remote access hole was discovered in the default installation. If you have a wide variety of obscure systems and want to support the same OS across all of them, check out NetBSD, which runs on nearly 70 platforms from Algor to VAX to Walnut. But both OpenBSD and NetBSD owe their major claim to fame (strong security or near-universal platform compatibility) in part to having a relatively restricted set of features. You can do a great deal with either operating system, but if you want a lot of bells and whistles, you should consider FreeBSD. This is an Intel platform OS with lots of developers dedicated to making your life easier. Summing up If relying on Microsoft products to secure your company scares you, and management is beginning to ask you about this “new” Linux thing it’s been hearing about, why not take advantage of management’s open-mindedness and try to steer it to one of the free versions of BSD UNIX instead? If you need a selling point, just point out that there are no license fees, so your organization won’t have to track all that software inventory that’s necessary when you have to pay for every copy you install on a new computer. |
| 回覆 |
| 阿紘 | 不知道為什麼..我還是比較喜歡redhat  我覺得要學就專一..這樣會比較精.. 第一次接觸就學redhat了..不過我的書買好兇阿 ="= |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 | freebsd啊... 我下載了四片4.6版的iso.... 現在連裝都還不會裝>"< 不過慢慢來吧... 兩個禮拜前才剛接觸linux... 裝了redhat7.3， 至今終於把我的x widnwo(KDE3.0)弄到了一個比較滿意的狀態了@@" |
| 回覆 |
| 會員  | 引用:
| |
| 回覆 |
| 會員 | 我同時有碰Linux和FreeBSD (Linux以Debian為主，因為RedHat和mandrake..等等真的都太肥了，不習慣用它) 對我來說，二套都是很好的OS，不管在功能和穩定度上 Debian我可以拿來當Desktop OS，因為Linux的solution很多，比較容易找的到屬於Desktop上要使用的軟體，升級方面，使用apt，除非必要，我不會再下載新版的iso FreeBSD我拿來當server，因為，我已經習慣了(這個理由好像有點奇怪)，升級方面，使用cvsup，讓我覺得不用再擔心安全和bugs的問題，因為，只要一個月來一次make world，三個月來一次ports-update，就什麼事情都沒有了..當然，我也從不下載最新版的iso，把頻寬留給需要的人 如同上面我所說 因為，這是OSS 每個人有充份選擇的權利 就看你習慣使用哪一種OS或是軟體 |
| 回覆 |
| XML | RSS 2.0 | RSS |
本論壇所有文章僅代表留言者個人意見，並不代表本站之立場，討論區以「即時留言」方式運作，故無法完全監察所有即時留言，若您發現文章可能有異議，請 email :[email protected] 處理。
