這個測試的目的在於對於三個月前各家防毒引擎進行未知病毒偵測率的測試
若想要查看各家掃描引擎的比較請查看這個網站二月與八月的測試
This test shows the pure proactive detection capability that the scanners had 3 months ago with best possible settings. Detection failures in a retrospective test are not up for discussion.
To determine how good a scanner is in detecting zoo-samples on-demand in general with updated signatures, have a look on our February and August tests.
In order to have the highest available protection and proactive detection capabilities, keep your Anti-Virus always up-to-date.
The used programs/updates are 3 month old due the design of the retrospective test. This is a way to determine the proactive detection capability of the various scan engines.
Due this, the percentages are of course not so high like in the regular on-demand tests with up-to-date anti-virus scanners.
Last revision of the data: 11/27/2004
[ 翻譯如下 ]
這個測試顯示純以三個月前的偵測掃描引擎的對於未知病毒的偵測能力. 偵測失敗率在這個回朔的測試中不予以討論.
若要討論決定在最新病毒碼版本之下什麼是一個好的掃描引擎，請查閱
二月 和
八月 的測試.
為了擁有最好的保護與未知病毒偵測能力，將您的防毒軟體永遠保持在最新狀態。
使用三個月前的程式/更新是為了設計回朔的測試。這是一個方法來決定一個掃描引擎對於未知病毒的偵測能力的優劣。
也就因此，對於病毒的偵測率遠低於一般正常且已更新至最新狀態的偵測率。
最新版本日期: 11/27/2004