【抱怨】千萬別用黑Net他簡直濫暴了!!!!!

第 1 頁,共 2 頁 1 2 末頁末頁
顯示結果從第 1 筆 到 10 筆,共計 16 筆
  1. #1
    會員 lulu1305174 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2003-06-07
    所在地區
    SEEDNET 2M/256K ADSL
    討論區文章
    648

    【抱怨】千萬別用黑Net他簡直濫暴了!!!!!

    黑Net連外有掛TP,據說最近國內也掛TP了,而黑Net最連外近狂掉圖和掉網頁,而黑Net在還沒有擴增大陸頻寬前ping中國電信高達500、600ms甚至最高時達1100ms而且常常掉包,擴增頻寬600多Mbps後ping值降到170~190ms,現在又恢復到500、600ms最高時達700、800ms,並且在擴充頻寬前最慢下載速度不到10KB甚至最低時只有幾百個位元組而已,而擴充頻寬前ping中國網通ping值達到300ms,現在掉到170~190ms,不過前幾天一度又到300m。ping HKIX的ping值在80~100ms前幾天也升到170~190ms現在恢復了,而且黑Net連外都無法跑到極速,另外黑Net連國內其他ISP有做限速措施,也無法跑到極速,而且連自家人的TWIX都塞車,流量高達500Mbps,另外黑Net用戶是無法下載Giga網路硬碟的。
    測試時間:6月7號PM7:15
    測速結果:
    HKIX:
    Pinging spring.itsc.cuhk.edu.hk [137.189.8.146] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=240
    Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=240
    Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=240
    Reply from 137.189.8.146: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=240

    Ping statistics for 137.189.8.146:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 136ms, Maximum = 151ms, Average = 142ms

    Pinging fjt.todayisp.com [61.145.112.44] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=761ms TTL=43
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=775ms TTL=43
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.

    Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 2, Lost = 2 (50% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 761ms, Maximum = 775ms, Average = 768ms
    Pinging cn.vip.cnb.yahoo.com [202.43.216.55] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=243
    Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=243
    Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=243
    Reply from 202.43.216.55: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=243

    Ping statistics for 202.43.216.55:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 147ms, Maximum = 177ms, Average = 159ms
    Pinging libra.sina.com.cn [61.135.153.176] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=52
    Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=52
    Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=52
    Reply from 61.135.153.176: bytes=32 time=274ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 61.135.153.176:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 272ms, Maximum = 343ms, Average = 292ms
    Pinging hk.yahoo.com [202.1.233.33] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=246
    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=246
    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=246
    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=246

    Ping statistics for 202.1.233.33:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 143ms, Maximum = 150ms, Average = 147ms
    Pinging sina.com.hk [202.85.139.140] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=239
    Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=239
    Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=239
    Reply from 202.85.139.140: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=239

    Ping statistics for 202.85.139.140:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 144ms
    Pinging kr.yahoo.com [211.32.119.135] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=337ms TTL=236
    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=339ms TTL=236
    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=236
    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=347ms TTL=236

    Ping statistics for 211.32.119.135:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 337ms, Maximum = 347ms, Average = 341ms
    YAHOO:
    Pinging www.yahoo.akadns.net [66.94.230.37] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=55
    Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=55
    Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=55
    Reply from 66.94.230.37: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 66.94.230.37:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 216ms, Maximum = 218ms, Average = 217ms

    Pinging www.google.akadns.net [66.102.7.104] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=244
    Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=199ms TTL=244
    Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=244
    Reply from 66.102.7.104: bytes=32 time=195ms TTL=244

    Ping statistics for 66.102.7.104:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 195ms, Maximum = 199ms, Average = 197ms

    Pinging www.giga.net.tw [203.133.0.185] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=119
    Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=119
    Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=119
    Reply from 203.133.0.185: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=119

    Ping statistics for 203.133.0.185:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 69ms, Average = 65ms














    測試時間:6月7日PM6:20





  2. #2
    會員
    註冊日期
    2004-03-11
    討論區文章
    591
    哇!!看圖說故事.......

  3. #3
    會員
    註冊日期
    2000-11-09
    討論區文章
    610
    我是懶的去PING
    最近自從全部升速後
    每天去的國內外網站都感覺變慢
    連大白天去KIMO都覺得變慢了

  4. #4
         mgoii 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2003-07-31
    討論區文章
    478
    我剛才也發了一帖,,強烈質疑hinet目前的連線品質有問題
    或許hinet會說,我降價了,也給你們用戶提高上傳了,當然要從其它地方把你們的錢"卡"過來

  5. #5
    jmi
    jmi 目前未上線
    高級會員 jmi 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2001-10-07
    討論區文章
    1,196
    呃...ADSL 1M/64K 能跑到 10x KB/s 的速度算正常吧~
    你認為是 1024 / 8 = 128 KB/s 才叫做極速嘛??


    拜託請不要再用注音文了啦!
    新手必看以下文章, 不然文章怎麼被砍的都不知道喔!!
    >> 新手必看!! PCZONE 版規
    >> 新手必看!!『提問的智慧』

  6. #6
    腥手上路 Fatland 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2001-04-24
    討論區文章
    111
    以速博的 ping 值來說和您的數值來比也是互有勝負,還可以接受吧

    #ping 61.145.112.44
    PING 61.145.112.44 (61.145.112.44): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=292.7 ms
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=282.1 ms
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=266.7 ms
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=260.4 ms

    #ping hk.yahoo.com
    PING hk.yahoo.com (202.1.233.33): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=221.6 ms
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=229.5 ms
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=228.1 ms
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=209.9 ms

    不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟,現在很多家都不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟,是誰的問題?

  7. #7
    搜尋 go dog
    註冊日期
    2004-05-06
    討論區文章
    47

  8. #8
    會員 cwl5858 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2002-08-17
    討論區文章
    2,259
    最初由 Fatland 發表
    以速博的 ping 值來說和您的數值來比也是互有勝負,還可以接受吧

    #ping 61.145.112.44
    PING 61.145.112.44 (61.145.112.44): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=292.7 ms
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=282.1 ms
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=266.7 ms
    64 bytes from 61.145.112.44: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=260.4 ms

    #ping hk.yahoo.com
    PING hk.yahoo.com (202.1.233.33): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=221.6 ms
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=229.5 ms
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=228.1 ms
    64 bytes from 202.1.233.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=209.9 ms

    不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟,現在很多家都不能捉 giga 的網路硬碟,是誰的問題?
    = =|||

    我的小isp看起來都比你們用的那些大isp好耶

    昨天晚上連去大陸打cs,朋友用黑net的ping都比我高= =..我還開emule勒..

    --------------------------------------------------
    Pinging 61.145.112.44 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=53
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=53
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=53
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=125ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 125ms, Average = 119ms
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Pinging hk.yahoo.com [202.1.233.33] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=246
    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=246
    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=246
    Reply from 202.1.233.33: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=246

    Ping statistics for 202.1.233.33:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 82ms, Maximum = 86ms, Average = 84ms
    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Pinging kr.yahoo.com [211.32.119.135] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=238
    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=238
    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=238
    Reply from 211.32.119.135: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=238

    Ping statistics for 211.32.119.135:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 111ms, Maximum = 131ms, Average = 117ms
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Pinging fjt.todayisp.com [61.145.112.44] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=53
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=128ms TTL=53
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=53
    Reply from 61.145.112.44: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 61.145.112.44:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 127ms, Maximum = 136ms, Average = 130ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------

  9. #9
    會員 cwl5858 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2002-08-17
    討論區文章
    2,259
    最初由 jmi 發表
    呃...ADSL 1M/64K 能跑到 10x KB/s 的速度算正常吧~
    你認為是 1024 / 8 = 128 KB/s 才叫做極速嘛??
    他是說目前黑net連外實在太糟糕了,且瀏覽個網頁都一直掉圖,誰不會氣啊!

    之前就是因為太鳥了才換掉的...

    名符其實的又貴又爛...

  10. #10
    明智光秀
    註冊日期
    2003-08-11
    所在地區
    TANET
    討論區文章
    70
    可是不用他要用誰啊?



類似的主題

  1. 千萬別用戰國策...
    作者:kupu 所在討論版:☉ -- 虛 擬 主 機 討 論 版
    回覆: 15
    最後發表: 2010-09-09, 05:45 PM
  2. 【抱怨】千萬別辦SO-NET(偷速嚴重8M>2M不到)
    作者:roc523 所在討論版:---- ADSL 抱 怨 與 鼓 勵
    回覆: 11
    最後發表: 2009-07-15, 09:45 PM
  3. 【抱怨】裝肖尾的黑NET
    作者:yamatucle 所在討論版:---- ADSL 抱 怨 與 鼓 勵
    回覆: 5
    最後發表: 2006-01-22, 11:45 AM
  4. 【抱怨】千萬別用台灣固網
    作者:chaokai 所在討論版:---- ADSL 抱 怨 與 鼓 勵
    回覆: 29
    最後發表: 2004-12-12, 01:18 AM
  5. 【抱怨】千萬別用SONET
    作者:is1128 所在討論版:---- ADSL 抱 怨 與 鼓 勵
    回覆: 45
    最後發表: 2003-08-28, 11:16 PM

 

此網頁沒有從搜尋引擎而來的訪客

發表文章規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以回覆文章
  • 不可以上傳附加檔案
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •