【求助】連線到日本的ISP選擇?

第 1 頁,共 2 頁 1 2 末頁末頁
顯示結果從第 1 筆 到 10 筆,共計 18 筆
  1. #1
    會員
    註冊日期
    2002-04-25
    討論區文章
    7

    【求助】連線到日本的ISP選擇?

    小弟有一套遊戲,必須連線到日本的伺服器,使用華奠的線路,不論何種速率,只要晩上18:00以後,就會出現LAG的情形,PING日本伺服器IP:202.177.202.70,
    大概每10次就會出現TIME OUT,因為有許多台灣玩家都有此種現象,造成困擾,想請教各位先進,不知還有哪家的ISP連日本比較穩定?或是哪位不是使用華奠線路的先進方便帮小弟PING看看?如蒙回覆,不勝感激!



  2. #2
    會員 Donna 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2001-12-09
    所在地區
    光世代100M/100M 50M/10M
    討論區文章
    257

    回覆: 【求助】連線到日本的ISP選擇?

    最初由 l560816 發表
    小弟有一套遊戲,必須連線到日本的伺服器,使用華奠的線路,不論何種速率,只要晩上18:00以後,就會出現LAG的情形,PING日本伺服器IP:202.177.202.70,
    大概每10次就會出現TIME OUT,因為有許多台灣玩家都有此種現象,造成困擾,想請教各位先進,不知還有哪家的ISP連日本比較穩定?或是哪位不是使用華奠線路的先進方便帮小弟PING看看?如蒙回覆,不勝感激!
    華電 1.5/384 固8
    Pinging 202.177.202.70 with 32 bytes of data:



    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=50

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=50

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=50



    Ping statistics for 202.177.202.70:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 101ms, Average = 99ms

  3. #3
    會員
    註冊日期
    2002-08-27
    所在地區
    ADSL 4M/1M
    討論區文章
    469
    我是用速博3M/512K固一的
    測了30次

    Pinging 202.177.202.70 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=91ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47

    Ping statistics for 202.177.202.70:
    Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 85ms, Maximum = 92ms, Average = 87ms

  4. #4
    會員 aeiou 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2003-06-27
    討論區文章
    4
    SEEDNET 1.5/64 DHCP

    Pinging 202.177.202.70 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=53
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=53
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=53
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 202.177.202.70:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 81ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 82ms

  5. #5
    會員
    註冊日期
    2002-04-25
    討論區文章
    7
    多謝三位的回覆,不過會LAG是在每天的18:00以後,抱歉小弟沒說清楚,還請有空的話再幚個忙,多謝!!



  6. #6
    ~我比較喜歡打槍 LordVader 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2002-01-26
    所在地區
    Seednet VDSL 4M/1M
    討論區文章
    3,437
    一樣30次,不過is.net已經掛了,最後的謝幕......

    Pinging 202.177.202.70 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 202.177.202.70:
    Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 94ms, Average = 80ms

    可能用戶斷線的斷線跳槽的跳槽,所以看起來還不錯
    ......好感傷竟然用倒一家ISP......
    (......瘟神來了怎知道、LordVader來報到......
    往後哪家ISP看到我上門可能會嚇死
    ∼對手的貪腐與無能、不是因循苟且原地踏步的藉口!!∼
    ~這年頭充斥各討論區的假用戶真業代置入性行銷文真令人反感與無奈~

  7. #7
    會員
    註冊日期
    2002-08-27
    所在地區
    ADSL 4M/1M
    討論區文章
    469
    最初由 LordVader 發表
    一樣30次,不過is.net已經掛了,最後的謝幕......

    可能用戶斷線的斷線跳槽的跳槽,所以看起來還不錯
    ......好感傷竟然用倒一家ISP......
    (......瘟神來了怎知道、LordVader來報到......
    往後哪家ISP看到我上門可能會嚇死
    呵呵
    老大就不要傷心了
    舊的不去新的不來啊
    祝您找到好用又便宜的拍賣帳號

  8. #8
    會員
    註冊日期
    2002-08-27
    所在地區
    ADSL 4M/1M
    討論區文章
    469
    剛剛測的
    6:35分

    Pinging 202.177.202.70 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=47
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=92ms TTL=47

    Ping statistics for 202.177.202.70:
    Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 85ms, Maximum = 99ms, Average = 88ms

  9. #9
    會員
    註冊日期
    2001-05-09
    討論區文章
    22
    也是剛剛測的... 18:58, Seednet T3 LeasedLine.

    C:\Documents and Settings\noodles>ping -n 30 202.177.202.70

    Pinging 202.177.202.70 with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
    Reply from 202.177.202.70: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 202.177.202.70:
    Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 55ms, Average = 46ms

  10. #10
    會員
    註冊日期
    2001-05-09
    討論區文章
    22
    再補一個給你參考, Test time: 19:04, Seednet T1/384 Bridge Mode ADSL.

    [root@firewall root]# ping -s 24 -c 30 202.177.202.70
    PING 202.177.202.70 (202.177.202.70) 24(52) bytes of data.
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=80.7 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=78.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=77.7 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=76.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=76.5 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=77.9 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=7 ttl=53 time=75.7 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=8 ttl=53 time=78.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=9 ttl=53 time=75.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=10 ttl=53 time=77.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=11 ttl=53 time=75.9 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=12 ttl=53 time=78.7 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=13 ttl=53 time=76.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=14 ttl=53 time=77.4 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=15 ttl=53 time=76.6 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=16 ttl=53 time=78.9 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=17 ttl=53 time=76.4 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=18 ttl=53 time=79.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=19 ttl=53 time=76.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=20 ttl=53 time=78.5 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=21 ttl=53 time=76.6 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=22 ttl=53 time=78.3 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=23 ttl=53 time=80.8 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=24 ttl=53 time=77.6 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=25 ttl=53 time=75.4 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=26 ttl=53 time=77.6 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=27 ttl=53 time=75.5 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=28 ttl=53 time=77.5 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=29 ttl=53 time=76.7 ms
    32 bytes from 202.177.202.70: icmp_seq=30 ttl=53 time=77.8 ms

    --- 202.177.202.70 ping statistics ---
    30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% packet loss, time 29290ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 75.480/77.581/80.822/1.392 ms
    [root@firewall root]#



類似的主題

  1. 【求助】請問一下∼我想連線到美國或是日本的那個比較快呢
    作者:swpoker 所在討論版:---- ADSL 方 案 與 費 率
    回覆: 5
    最後發表: 2006-02-17, 06:38 PM
  2. 住在台南市東區的人請幫忙一下(關於ADSL的ISP選擇)
    作者:nickels 所在討論版:---- ADSL 方 案 與 費 率
    回覆: 0
    最後發表: 2005-05-24, 02:36 AM
  3. 關於netmeeting連到日本的問題??
    作者:draculaxx 所在討論版:-- 網 路 軟 體 討 論 二 版 (網路其他軟體)
    回覆: 0
    最後發表: 2001-07-11, 12:07 PM

 

此網頁沒有從搜尋引擎而來的訪客

發表文章規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以回覆文章
  • 不可以上傳附加檔案
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •