【抱怨】為何seednet的網路時好時壞

第 1 頁,共 2 頁 1 2 末頁末頁
顯示結果從第 1 筆 到 10 筆,共計 18 筆
  1. #1
    會員
    註冊日期
    2001-02-27
    討論區文章
    57

    【抱怨】為何seednet的網路時好時壞

    我家的網路只要一到晚上,伺服器回應就會變得很慢
    有什麼方法可以解決呢?

    C:\>ping www.hinet.net -l 1400

    Pinging www.hinet.net [168.95.1.88] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=1034ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=1207ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=1773ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=2629ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 168.95.1.88:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1034ms, Maximum = 2629ms, Average = 1660ms

    C:\>time
    現在時間是: 20:42:02.32



  2. #2
    會員
    註冊日期
    2003-06-25
    討論區文章
    1
    不會阿~~我是seednet 1.5/384 中壢區域的用戶.我用的很順阿

    我是剛從hinet轉seednet的.想到以前用hinet的adsl那才是欲哭無淚阿

  3. #3
    環工小彥
    註冊日期
    2002-01-27
    所在地區
    ADSL 2M/256
    討論區文章
    158
    以下我測試的結果,供你參考。
    你可打電話給Seednet請他幫你測試一下,說不定會幫你找出問題所在。

    C:\>ping www.hinet.net -l 1400

    Pinging www.hinet.net [168.95.1.88] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=296ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=281ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=297ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=297ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 168.95.1.88:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 281ms, Maximum = 297ms, Average = 292ms

    C:\>time
    現在時間是: 23:59:47.84

  4. #4
    會員
    註冊日期
    2003-06-27
    討論區文章
    1
    剛剛測的
    C:\WINDOWS>ping www.hinet.net -l 1400

    Pinging www.hinet.net [168.95.1.88] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=261ms TTL=248
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=274ms TTL=248
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=275ms TTL=248
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=275ms TTL=248

    Ping statistics for 168.95.1.88:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 261ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 271ms

    C:\WINDOWS>ping www.seed.net.tw -l 1400

    Pinging www.seed.net.tw [192.72.80.36] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=275ms TTL=253
    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=261ms TTL=253
    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=275ms TTL=253
    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=275ms TTL=253

    Ping statistics for 192.72.80.36:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 261ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 271ms


    C:\WINDOWS>ping www.pczone.com.tw -l 1400

    Pinging www.pczone.com.tw [202.43.85.163] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.

    Ping statistics for 202.43.85.163:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
    有人可以告訴我pczoze的數值為什麼會這樣阿

  5. #5
    人工智能80
    註冊日期
    2002-08-26
    所在地區
    seednet 10M/2M
    討論區文章
    1,226
    為何要用-l 1400?



  6. #6
    人工智能80
    註冊日期
    2002-08-26
    所在地區
    seednet 10M/2M
    討論區文章
    1,226
    我到是覺得中華電信連日本常快時慢......=.=
    之前超慢的,現在又超快的......我想還是會變慢吧......XD

  7. #7
    阿紘 ahome 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2001-01-08
    所在地區
    交換中心無上限頻寬
    討論區文章
    4,896
    seednet不錯用啦
    至少比黑net搞TP好多了

    C:\Documents and Settings\nano horng>ping www.hinet.net -l 1400

    Pinging www.hinet.net [168.95.1.88] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=98ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=98ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=98ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=98ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 168.95.1.88:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 98ms, Average = 98ms
    人生不一定要追求夢想... 夢想成真的那刻你只是會換來之後更多的失落...

  8. #8
    會員
    註冊日期
    2001-06-28
    所在地區
    中華10m/2m
    討論區文章
    230
    剛剛測試的
    C:\>ping www.hinet.net -l 1400

    Pinging www.hinet.net [168.95.1.88] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=280ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=270ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=280ms TTL=247
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=280ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 168.95.1.88:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 270ms, Maximum = 280ms, Average = 277ms

  9. #9
    none
    註冊日期
    2002-05-04
    討論區文章
    19
    我也來測測...

    C:\>ping www.hinet.net -l 1400

    Pinging www.hinet.net [168.95.1.88] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=321ms TTL=248
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=290ms TTL=248
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=281ms TTL=248
    Reply from 168.95.1.88: bytes=1400 time=290ms TTL=248

    Ping statistics for 168.95.1.88:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 281ms, Maximum = 321ms, Average = 295ms

    C:\>ping www.seed.net.tw -l 1400

    Pinging www.seed.net.tw [192.72.80.36] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=331ms TTL=253
    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=270ms TTL=253
    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=281ms TTL=253
    Reply from 192.72.80.36: bytes=1400 time=280ms TTL=253

    Ping statistics for 192.72.80.36:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 270ms, Maximum = 331ms, Average = 290ms

    C:\>ping www.pczone.com.tw -l 1400

    Pinging www.pczone.com.tw [202.43.85.163] with 1400 bytes of data:

    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.

    Ping statistics for 202.43.85.163:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

    開pczone的網頁都有點慢....是不是dns的問題?
    之前gamebase連不上就是dns掛掉

    為什麼ahome您的雙向512 time=98ms...我跟樓上的就290ms @@?
    怎麼差這麼多...早晚差異嗎

    最近浮動ip常常撥到 210.68.xx.xx的, 這是不是最近新增的ip阿??
    以前61.開頭的速度很穩(好懷念><), 211.74.xx.xx的不是很好
    是不是我想太多@@ (我不是很懂...sorry)

    昨天去申請升速了...1.5/384
    seednet加油阿...><

  10. #10
    會員 speed101 的大頭照
    註冊日期
    2001-09-01
    所在地區
    光纖
    討論區文章
    1,650
    請問您所用的偵毒軟體是哪套呢? 如果是趨勢2003版的話,先把他解除安裝試試看



類似的主題

  1. 我家的SO-NET時好時壞!!
    作者:52613 所在討論版:---- ADSL 抱 怨 與 鼓 勵
    回覆: 6
    最後發表: 2004-02-29, 10:56 PM
  2. 鍵盤時好時壞??
    作者:alec5106 所在討論版:-- 電 腦 硬 體 討 論 版
    回覆: 3
    最後發表: 2003-02-27, 10:51 PM
  3. YAMAHA 2100S 時好時壞(讀不到片)
    作者:MYURD 所在討論版:-- 光 碟 燒 錄 討 論 版
    回覆: 9
    最後發表: 2002-04-24, 01:53 PM
  4. 為什ping值時好時壞~~~~~
    作者:SEGA 所在討論版:---- ADSL 抱 怨 與 鼓 勵
    回覆: 0
    最後發表: 2001-08-02, 06:34 PM
  5. domain解析,時好時壞?
    作者:leon0804 所在討論版:-- 網 路 技 術 版
    回覆: 2
    最後發表: 2001-05-04, 01:40 PM

 

此網頁沒有從搜尋引擎而來的訪客

發表文章規則

  • 不可以發表新主題
  • 不可以回覆文章
  • 不可以上傳附加檔案
  • 不可以編輯自己的文章
  •