Celeron 1200@1600 vs XP 1600效能評比

[s800]

1.這是引用美國的網站資料
2.看起來c1200 oc c1600還沒有輸 xp 1600很多
3.連結如下

http://www.overclockers.com/articles494/

成績比較如下
Celeron 1600 vs XP 1600
Benchmark Celeron @ 1600 XP 1600 @ 1400 % Diff
SiSandra CPU 4494/2145 3874/1921 -14/-10 %
SiSandra MM 8709/10811 7755/8924 -11/-17 %
SiSandra Memory 456/479 632/723 39/51 %
Quake 154.0/147.2 197.5/194.5 28/32 %
3D Mark 2001 4164 4432 6.4 %

[johnbird]

最初由 s800 發表
1.這是引用美國的網站資料
2.看起來c1200 oc c1600還沒有輸 xp 1600很多
3.連結如下

http://www.overclockers.com/articles494/

成績比較如下
Celeron 1600 vs XP 1600
Benchmark Celeron @ 1600 XP 1600 @ 1400 % Diff
SiSandra CPU 4494/2145 3874/1921 -14/-10 %
SiSandra MM 8709/10811 7755/8924 -11/-17 %
SiSandra Memory 456/479 632/723 39/51 %
Quake 154.0/147.2 197.5/194.5 28/32 %
3D Mark 2001 4164 4432 6.4 %

看不太懂你的數據...到底哪邊是XP的數據呀???
基本上Celeron就算是和同時脈的雷鳥或是DURON比都不可能會贏呀!!
更何況是和XP比勒.........根本沒贏面嘛!!

[s800]

最初由 johnbird 發表

看不太懂你的數據...到底哪邊是XP的數據呀???
基本上Celeron就算是和同時脈的雷鳥或是DURON比都不可能會贏呀!!
更何況是和XP比勒.........根本沒贏面嘛!!

不好意思,我是直接複製網頁內之表格數據,沒有重製.....詳細資料還請您連結原網頁

http://www.overclockers.com/articles494/

[johnbird]

最初由 s800 發表


不好意思,我是直接複製網頁內之表格數據,沒有重製.....詳細資料還請您連結原網頁

http://www.overclockers.com/articles494/

我已經去看完了數據如下:
Celeron 1600 vs XP 1600
<table border="1" width="450">
<tr>
<td width="31%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">Benchmark</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">Celeron @ 1600</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">XP 1600 @ 1400</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">% Diff</div></b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="31%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">SiSandra CPU</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">4494/2145</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">3874/1921</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">-14/-10 %</div></b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="31%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">SiSandra MM</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">8709/10811</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">7755/8924</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">-11/-17 %</div></b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="31%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">SiSandra Memory</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">456/479</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">632/723</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">39/51 %</div></b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="31%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">Quake</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">154.0/147.2</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">197.5/194.5</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">28/32 %</div></b></font></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="31%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">3D Mark 2001</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">4164</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">4432</div></b></font></td>
<td width="23%"><font face="Arial, Sans-Serif"><b><div align="center">6.4 %</div></b></font></td>
</tr>
</table>
但是真是太扯了...有可能嗎??
雖然ATHLON XP 1600+速度只有1400MHZ但是也不可能會輸呀!!
它有提到測試機版是XP333會不會是因為它........