seednet的連線是不是沒救了…誰可以幫我反應上去…



贊助商連結


pipie
2009-07-25, 01:37 AM
大家好:
我租用了一個國外主機架設論壇…

因為速度不佳和主機商反應多次…

但是後來經由網友協助測試後發現了一個問題…

就是seednet(我的ISP)跟本就提供了很爛的網路品質…

因此我的主機商再怎麼幫我移IP都沒用…seednet的爛誰能幫我反應給上面的人知道…

我超想跳槽的啦…

tracert美國主機…
seednet PK 台固

seednet先上:

11 * 354 ms 389 ms level3-10ge-peering [77.67.69.98]
12 371 ms 365 ms 384 ms vlan89.csw3.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.18.190]
13 363 ms 353 ms 365 ms ae-82-82.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.134.217]
14 387 ms 372 ms 376 ms ae-3.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.58]
15 373 ms 391 ms 374 ms ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.38]
16 389 ms 389 ms 392 ms ae-3.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.132.62]
17 * 420 ms 408 ms ae-6.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.140.189]
18 390 ms * 383 ms ae-11-51.car1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.2]
19 * 422 ms 415 ms ge-3-3-0.er1.Chi1.Servernap.net [4.79.65.50]
20 362 ms 362 ms 351 ms pos2-1.csr1.Chi3.Servernap.net [69.39.239.170]
21 432 ms 433 ms 425 ms server316.webhostingpad.com [69.65.3.151]

台固:
11 168 ms 174 ms 166 ms xe-11-1-0.edge1.SanJose3.level3.net [4.68.111.189]
12 173 ms 181 ms 191 ms vlan79.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.18.126]
13 185 ms 298 ms 185 ms ae-2.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.132.9]
14 363 ms 199 ms 377 ms ae-3.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.58]
15 193 ms 210 ms 204 ms ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.38]
16 354 ms 216 ms 220 ms ae-3.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.132.62]
17 224 ms 216 ms 252 ms ae-6.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.140.189]
18 220 ms 240 ms 194 ms ge-3-3-0.er1.Chi1.Servernap.net [4.79.65.50]
19 208 ms 236 ms 199 ms ge-3-3-0.er1.Chi1.Servernap.net [4.79.65.50]
20 194 ms 212 ms 195 ms pos2-1.csr1.Chi3.Servernap.net [69.39.239.170]
21 207 ms 208 ms 190 ms server316.webhostingpad.com [69.65.3.151]

看來大間真的沒用…
太讓人失望了!
:mad:

贊助商連結


tvirus
2009-07-25, 02:56 AM
把你完整的trace路徑弄出來
前面不用這麼躲躲藏藏

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert server316.webhostingpad.com

Tracing route to server316.webhostingpad.com [69.65.3.151]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 16 ms 21 ms 16 ms 59-105-193-1.static.seed.net.tw [59.105.193.1]
2 * * 16 ms 139.175.15.94
3 16 ms 16 ms 16 ms R122-194.seed.net.tw [192.72.122.194]
4 22 ms 22 ms 22 ms R58-109.seed.net.tw [139.175.58.109]
5 23 ms 22 ms 23 ms R59-19.seed.net.tw [139.175.59.19]
6 26 ms 22 ms 22 ms R57-37.seed.net.tw [139.175.57.37]
7 22 ms 22 ms 66 ms R59-177.seed.net.tw [139.175.59.177]
8 152 ms 153 ms 152 ms R58-18.seed.net.tw [139.175.58.18]
9 153 ms 153 ms 187 ms ae0-101.pao10.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.68.213]
10 163 ms 172 ms 163 ms level3-10ge-peering [77.67.69.98]
11 166 ms 178 ms 166 ms vlan79.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.18.126]
12 168 ms 163 ms 163 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.134.213]

13 206 ms 216 ms 215 ms ae-3.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.58]
14 211 ms 215 ms 216 ms ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.38]
15 215 ms 215 ms 215 ms ae-3.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.132.62]
16 226 ms 216 ms 216 ms ae-6.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.140.189]
17 216 ms 216 ms 216 ms ae-11-55.car1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.130]

18 201 ms 201 ms 201 ms ge-0-1-0.er1.Chi1.Servernap.net [4.71.246.26]
19 203 ms 202 ms 202 ms pos2-1.csr1.Chi3.Servernap.net [69.39.239.170]
20 212 ms 211 ms 212 ms server316.webhostingpad.com [69.65.3.151]

Trace complete.

pipie
2009-07-25, 03:53 AM
由seednet 2M的線路所測…

超爛的值…還會掉封包…

瀏覽台灣的網站都還算快速…

一連到美國就趴了…

1 47 ms 47 ms 48 ms 59-104-62-1.adsl.dynamic.seed.net.tw [59.104.62.1]
2 50 ms 50 ms 49 ms sj79-60.dialup.seed.net.tw [192.72.79.60]
3 47 ms 49 ms 49 ms R121-66.seed.net.tw [192.72.121.66]
4 48 ms 49 ms 48 ms R57-41.seed.net.tw [139.175.57.41]
5 51 ms 51 ms 55 ms R58-65.seed.net.tw [139.175.58.65]
6 51 ms 51 ms 51 ms R59-19.seed.net.tw [139.175.59.19]
7 52 ms 53 ms 51 ms R57-37.seed.net.tw [139.175.57.37]
8 54 ms 53 ms 55 ms R59-177.seed.net.tw [139.175.59.177]
9 181 ms 183 ms 183 ms R58-18.seed.net.tw [139.175.58.18]
10 430 ms * 431 ms ae0-101.pao10.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.68.213]
11 282 ms 281 ms 285 ms level3-10ge-peering [77.67.69.98]
12 280 ms * 292 ms vlan79.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.18.126]
13 282 ms 285 ms 285 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.134.213]
14 321 ms 326 ms 325 ms ae-3.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.58]
15 332 ms 327 ms * ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.38]
16 333 ms * 330 ms ae-3.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.132.62]
17 336 ms 329 ms 330 ms ae-6.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.140.189]
18 457 ms 455 ms 448 ms ae-11-55.car1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.130]
19 362 ms 352 ms 350 ms ge-3-3-0.er1.Chi1.Servernap.net [4.79.65.50]
20 294 ms 291 ms 293 ms pos2-1.csr1.Chi3.Servernap.net [69.39.239.170]
21 359 ms 358 ms 358 ms server316.webhostingpad.com [69.65.3.151]



Trace complete.

FYI
2009-07-25, 11:59 AM
不知道Seednet 撥接/DHCP 用戶申請撥接/DHCP 式固定IP 是否會有改善? 在seednet to tinet 這一段, 或許優先權差很多